All you need to know about COVID 19 (PART 1)

Here on things are becoming pretty clear that living amidst Covid 19 virus is going to be a new reality until we get a vaccine. In this series of posts we will be answering many frequently asked questions regarding COVID 19. 
COVID 19 coronavirus

When you get some product from outside during covid-19, How much time should you leave it alone for?

To take a decision regarding how long you have to leave the product alone depends on the type of material. This infographic below is self explanatory to make you understand how long the virus lasts on various types of surfaces.
You can leave the home deliveries that you receive at least for 15-30 minutes in direct sunlight. Corona viruses degrade quickly in temperatures higher than 56 degrees Celsius, and in direct UV light. 
For small articles you can use following to clean surfaces
  • Diluted bleach
  • Diluted Detergents 
  • Alcohol solutions 

How does alcohol in hand sanitisers (and soap) kill the coronavirus?

Novel coronavirus has a lipid envelope. Soap being a detergent destroys the envelope. Similarly sanitizers having 60% alcohol or above also destroy the envelope of the virus.

What is the extent of success against COVID 19 by Government of India?

We should all commend the efforts of government of India, atleast till now the virus growth rate has been kept in control. They have also been successful in implementing one of the most strictly implemented lockdowns in the world. It is not possible to eliminate Covid 19 virus transmission as of now without the aid of a vaccine, but until a vaccine comes into the picture, controlled transmission and gradual strengthening of the herd immunity seems to be only way forward. Here is a video posted by a popular vlogger Project Nightfall which has lauded the efforts of Indian government:

Which hospital to successfully launched plasma therapy to treat COVID 19 in India?

  • SMS hospital, Jaipur  – Link
  • Max Hospital, New Delhi – Link
  • ICMR has approved PLACID Trial to test the effectiveness of plasma therapy – Link. Following are the hospitals which have been approved to participate in this study:
  1. Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research in Chandigarh
  2. Madras Medical College in Chennai
  3. Smart NHL Municipal Medical College in Ahmedabad
  4. BJ Medical College and Civil Hospital in Ahmedabad
  5. Sawai Man Singh Medical College in Jaipur
  6. Government Medical College, Nagpur
  7. Gandhi Medical College, Telangana 
  8. Gandhi Medical College, Bhopal.
However it should be understood that plasma therapy is not a magic bullet or it is going to make a big dramatic difference. It is going to be one of various options to treat severely ill Covid 19 patients along with other drugs. (Link)

Can famotidine 20mg tablets protect us from COVID 19?

Preliminary study has shown that “Compared to the rest of the patients, those who received famotidine had a greater than two-fold decreased risk of either dying or being intubated” (Link) . To come to a conclusion regarding its real effectiveness, a randomized control trial is required (Link).

References

The Arogyada
www.arogyada.in

What are the problems with the Indian healthcare system which the Modi government will have to tackle?

After a strong mandate the Modi government has received in general elections, everybody is having a lot

of hopes from the government.  They are hoping and waiting for transformatory changes and  strong steps to be taken in direction of revival of the Indian economy. Very soon we will be having a draft of intention of the Modi government in our hands in the form of the union budget. What kind of changes are we going to expect for the healthcare sector?

We have a Prime Minister who seems to be pro reforms and above all we have a new Health Minister, who is a doctor himself. Will this combination add up to some bold steps translating into results or are we going to have the same run of the mill actions which would lead to no substantial changes in the long run?

There are a lot of issues which have been left unattended in the past ten years which directly impact the current status and the future of healthcare in India. The time will tell which of these issues are attended by the Modi government and which are left to hang in the continuing limbo:

  • Still the India’s government spends only about 1% of GDP on healthcare (rest comes from the private)
  • India is one amongst the countries having highest out of pocket expenditures (ranked 17th, WHO 2011), resulting from lack of trust in government facilities & hospitals and lack of any universal coverage schemes 
  • The last health policy we have dates back to 2002, we should be hoping that the new government will come up with a new policy which will reset the current direction
  • Government health administrative machinery as a whole is a hyper-divided structure with overlapping actions and schemes 
  • For instance, health ministry is responsible for quality and public health, but pricing and manufacturing of pharmaceuticals is with Department of Pharmaceuticals under the Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers. Ministry of Consumer Affairs and Food regulates some of the aspects. The commerce ministry deals with various trade related issues, whereas Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion (DIPP) looks after patents.
  • There are also various regulators such as National Pharmaceutical Pricing Authority (NPPA), Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI), Drugs Controller General of India (DCGI) and Patent Controller General of India monitoring different issues in the sector under different ministries.
  • There are no streamlined processes or guidance for approvals or dealing with these departments. The beneficiary party has to run pillar to post paying “cuts” at every step in all these departments for necessary approvals for healthcare & pharma businesses
  • NRHM, a flagship scheme started by central government also has had its own set of problems which range from problems with timely procurement of medicines & supplies to lack of staffing in rural areas.
  • The lead professional body MCI itself has been a source of corruption when it comes to approval of private medical colleges
We as medical professionals have seen the quality of medical education & quality of life of young doctors go from bad to worse in past ten years. This can be attributed to one or more of the following unending list of problems which medical professionals are facing these days.
  • Vote bank politics increasing reservations without substantial logic
  • Dwindling meritocracy
  • Archaic medical education system failing to promote skill development
  • Uncountable number of scams in the selection process & open sale of medical seats
  • Lack of any coordination between the centre & states over critical selection processes continuing from many years without any improvement 
  • Disparity in standards of medical education across various states and centre sponsored colleges
  • Medical colleges getting approvals without facilities & requisite staff; government colleges failing to maintain their quality standards
  • Over exploitation of junior doctors by both government & private employers in terms of overtime, low pay scales, lack of facilities & mammoth contract bonds making a viable living from hard to virtually impossible
  • The pay scales in specific, in many states have not seen any raise to cover inflation leading to declining quality of life of Government doctors 
  • Dwindling levels of academic activities and increasing  use of young doctors as bonded labourers to cover up shortage of nursing and paramedical staff in government hospitals (especially in states like Tamil Nadu)
  • Doctors on rural services face problems with their families like no arrangements for proper education, transport and residence along with workplace issues including poorly equipped, under staffed and poorly supplied healthcare facilities
Many young doctors discouraged by a sky high heap of unattended problems either choose to migrate to foreign soils or many of them are not choosing to practice at all and looking for profession change. 
This is very much apparent with the rising number of Indian applicants to countries like USA, Canada, Germany, Australia and Ireland.  
In addition to this, the medical professional profiles you happen to see these days are swaying in the direction of non-practice corporate jobs which offer a descent lifestyle to young doctors. For instance this blog alone gets 200-300 search queries each day from google inquiring alternative career options after MBBS. The majority of these corporate jobs are for pharma majors or service industry working for the US and other countries. 
Till the date, I have read that the new government is planning to formulate a new Health Policy, a program on sanitation and start National Health Assurance Mission (I guess it must be the brand name they would use to promote after making a few tweaks to the NRHM). They will also do the usual – promoting yoga in AYUSH. They plan to continue to establish AIIMS like institutions in all the states. 
Let’s have hope that the new government will also be looking into some of the issues discussed above and plan for some incremental steps in the right direction. 
References
  • http://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/health-high-on-modi-s-agenda-114051900925_1.html
  • http://www.business-standard.com/article/politics/govt-to-bring-in-experts-to-implement-health-schemes-effectively-114053001429_1.html
  • http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Presidents-speech-highlights-12-key-points-of-the-Modi-government/articleshow/36309560.cms
  • http://presidentofindia.nic.in/sp090614.html
  • http://content.healthaffairs.org/content/25/2/380.full
The Arogyada
www.arogyada.in

My daily dose of Air Pollution in Hyderabad

Past few weeks I have been observing municipal employees in Hyderabad burning waste in open in the stretch between Road no 10, Jubilee Hills and the areas around the KBR park, my route for going to work. I see at least 10-12 heaps of waste burning just in this 4 km stretch everyday and that is just a small part of the larger picture across other areas of Hyderabad and other cities in India. Open burning constitutes up to 20% of overall air pollution in some of the big cities in India.

I am sure we guys from India are so used to such open burning of waste, that our brain has just stopped responding to the sight and the discomfort of suffocation caused by it. Many a times we just pass by a burning pile of waste holding our breath pretending that
we didn’t inhale that smoke full of carcinogens, failing to realize that it is not just the momentary exposure which will kill us but the overall degradation of air quality in and around our locality, our workplace and the places we visit on regular basis. It is that daily silent dose which is doing the work as we speak.


The worst part is that the open burning of waste is being done by the employees of the municipal authority which is supposed to regulate the air quality in the city (posting the pics along).

For those who are not aware, typically smoke constitutes mainly of particulate matter, hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide, sulphur dioxide and carcinogenic dioxins/furans. Air pollution is a significant risk factor for various diseases including increased frequency of respiratory infections, chronic heart diseases, hypertension and lung cancer, according to the WHO. Apart from our health, our actions are also catalyzing climate change (read here how air pollution from Asia is affecting world’s weather).

Of all the causes of air pollution, I guess it is relatively easier to prevent open burning of waste. Even then, I am not aware of any regulation against the open burning of wastes in India neither are there any awareness campaigns or at least some advertisements in mass media which can change this behavior of people around.

Hope somebody takes a notice of this!

Do share this post and your stories too so that our voice can be heard. 

The Arogyada
www.arogyada.in

Five Key Challenges for Indian Health Insurance Industry

In the current scenarios Indian health insurance industry can be considered to still be in its infancy. The next few years posit a plethora of challenges. Have highlighted key five areas of concern.

1. Lack of standardised transactions between the insurer and hospitals or the insurer and insured. This often results in individual interpretation and methodology for processes like claims and pre-authorization

2. Use of non-standard terminologies with regards to treatment protocols and care plans. In fact absence or minimal documentation and implementation of standard care pathways become a cause of conflict with regards to services covered/not covered for payment via the insurer. This gets further aggravated with extremely poor usage and implementation of ICD codes

3. Skewed penetration (much higher in urban India than rural) of private health insurers within the Indian population leading to asymmetric distribution of risk. This ultimately on one hand bleeds the insurer, on other hand hits the insured due to higher premiums and finally also the hospitals due to higher rejection rates

4. Non SLA based transactions between hospitals and insurers. Response time and request closure time for crucial transactions like pre-auth filling, pre-auth approval, claim filling, and claim approval is still not a strictly followed dimension.

5. Both hospital and insurer hold sensitive patient data but we are still far from having any form of implementable India specific law or guidelines to protect and securely exchange patient data between two major pillars of healthcare industry

The Arogyada
www.arogyada.in

Cancer death rates: US vs India

Cancer is a rampant public health problem globally. There is an interesting emerging global trend in Cancer incidences  and death rates. While the rates are decreasing in the United States and many other western countries, they are increasing in less developed and economically transitioning countries[1]. Taking in perspective US and India, this trend is apparent from recent National cancer projections.

A recent report by American Cancer Society (ACS) published on January 17th 2013, revealed that overall cancer deaths in US have declined by 20% since their peak in 1991. The report notes that cancer deaths rates have fallen from 1991 (their peak) to 2009 (the most recent figures available), decreasing from 215.1 to 173.1 per 100,000 [2].

However looking at the current trends in India, it has been projected that the total cancer cases are likely to go up from 979,786 cases in the year 2010 to 1,148,757 cases in the year 2020 [3].
The latest available figure of cancer death rate is from national representative study conducted by Tata Memorial Hospital in 2001—03 [4]. The Age-standardised cancer mortality rates per 100 000 were: Rural- M=95·6  F=96·6 and Urban- M=102·4 F=91·2.

Taking cancer seriously and taking public health measures for prevention and early detection has started paying dividends for US. While in India we are walking the same path already travelled by the developed nations;  by failing to stop the adoption of unhealthy western lifestyles such as smoking and physical inactivity and consumption of calorie-dense food.  Measures in the form of awareness creation, prevention and early detection are required to cut this trend.

[1]  Ahmedin Jemal, Melissa M. Center, Carol DeSantis and Elizabeth M. Ward : Global Patterns of Cancer Incidence and Mortality Rates and Trends
[2] Rebecca Siegel MPH; Deepa Naishadham MA, MS; Ahmedin Jemal DVM, PhD : Cancer Statistics 2013 (CA: A cancer journal for clinicians)
[3] Ramnath Takiar,Deenu Nadayil,A Nandakumar : Projections of Number of Cancer Cases in India (2010-2020) by Cancer Groups
[4] Rajesh Dikshit, Prakash C Gupta et al. : Cancer mortality in India- a nationally representative survey

View Dr Sandeep Moolchandani's profile on LinkedIn

The Arogyada
www.arogyada.in

Healthcare IT : What Indian Government is doing and what it should do?

From outcomes perspective, many studies have shown that Health IT has the potential to enable a dramatic transformation in the delivery of health care, making it safer, more effective, and more efficient. Taking lessons from developed nations and looking at the trends, in future healthcare IT is not going to play a side role but it is going to take a central stage in all healthcare business operations. With this background, it seems to be a crucial time to come up with National Health Information Technology policy, guidelines and standards to ensure uniformity in HIT adoption and use across the country…..Read More at HospitalInfraBiz.com

The Arogyada
www.arogyada.in

Public Private Partnerships in Healthcare : A Win-Win Strategy for all Stakeholders

For developing countries, PPPs can be utilized as a strategic tool to  strengthen healthcare delivery system  and accelerate achievement of healthcare development  goals. Though some critics consider PPP as another catalyst in increasing privatization, but we don’t have paucity of examples to demonstrate the positive impacts of PPPs. Following are some of the points why PPPs are considered as a Win-Win strategy for all the stakeholders.
For the Public: Focused healthcare development initiatives utilizing PPP can result in provision of healthcare services in a better way improving the affordability and accessibility for those sections of society which are in acute need. Outcomes can be expected in a defined span of time.
For the Government: A PPP can enable the government to deliver best value for taxpayer’s money by utilizing the private party’s skills which add to the scope for innovation in the project. In addition to this the private parties bring with them the potential to operate efficiently and effectively. The effects of interventions can be visible in a time bound manner. There is also an added risk control in the project as the private party is an experienced player in handling similar assignments.
For the Private Party: For companies/civil organizations aiming to contribute to the society, this can be one of the channels through which they can help in improving the key development indices which as a result can generate a long drawn impact on future healthcare outcomes of the society. Another incentive for big corporation/companies to enter this kind of engagement is building business at the bottom of the pyramid which can give them competitive edge in terms of knowledge and experience. The base of the pyramid also has some big numbers on it- 4 billion people with per capita income of less than $1500 (Commission on Private Sector and Development, 2004). (India alone has 700 million people in rural markets; whereas China has a billion)

View Dr Sandeep Moolchandani's LinkedIn profileView Dr Sandeep Moolchandani’s profile

The Arogyada
www.arogyada.in

Five key differences between Indian and US healthcare systems

Just a FYI post to understand the basic differences between Indian and US healthcare system. This kind of comparative study can help us understand the good features and flaws in both the systems.



  1. In India the total expenditure as percentage of GDP is as low as 4-5 %. Whereas in US it is well beyond world standards, as high as 16.2 % of GDP. With highest per capita expenditure in the world US is ranked on 37th position, which indicates that increasing expenditure on healthcare is not the only solution to improve the health status of the citizens. On the other hand, India ranks quite low and stands at 112 which is well below countries like Sri Lanka(76) and Bangladesh (88). 
  2. The Indian Healthcare system can be considered as a Mixed Healthcare System where there is a government health infrastructure which provides healthcare at primary, secondary and tertiary levels. In addition to this there is a strong presence of private healthcare infrastructure which is growing stronger by the day with decline of trust of people in public hospitals. While in US the system is majorly privately funded where the employers are supposed to fund for the employees working with them. There is public funding is available only for unemployed people who cannot afford to purchase health insurance.
  3. Out of the pocket payments account for 70% of healthcare costs in India which warrants a work up on strengthening of financing mechanisms like insurance. On the other hand in US the out of pocket expenditure stands at around 10-12%.
  4. With the perspective of  outcomes, in India the Life expectancy at birth m/f (in years) is 63/66 while that for US is 76/81. Another important factor is Probability of dying under five (per 1000 live births) which indicates the load of infective diseases which affect children and the ability of the healthcare system to deal with them . In India the Probability of dying under five is as high as 66 per 1000 live births while that of US is 8 per 1000 live births.
  5. India has a universal health care system run by the local (state or territorial) governments. Government hospitals provide treatment at taxpayer expense. Most essential drugs are offered free of charge in these hospitals. However, the fact that the government sector is understaffed, underfinanced and that these hospitals maintain very poor standards of hygiene forces many people to visit private medical practitioners.. The United States does not have a universal health care system; it is a proposed reform. The Obama administration health care reform, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, seeks to have near-univesal healthcare insurance coverage to legal residents.
The Arogyada
www.arogyada.in

National Rural Health Mission : A Social Healthcare System In Its Juvenile Stages

Introduction To National Rural Health Mission
http://mohfw.nic.in/NRHM.htm

Recognizing the importance of Health in the process of economic and social
development and improving the quality of life of our citizens, the Government of India has
resolved to launch the National Rural Health Mission to carry out necessary architectural
correction in the basic health care delivery system. The Mission adopts a synergistic
approach by relating health to determinants of good health viz. segments of nutrition,
sanitation, hygiene and safe drinking water. It also aims at mainstreaming the Indian
systems of medicine to facilitate health care. The Plan of Action includes increasing public
expenditure on health, reducing regional imbalance in health infrastructure, pooling
resources, integration of organizational structures, optimization of health manpower,
decentralization and district management of health programmes, community participation
and ownership of assets, induction of management and financial personnel into district
health system, and operationalizing community health centers into functional hospitals
meeting Indian Public Health Standards in each Block of the Country.
The Goal of the Mission is to improve the availability of and access to quality
health care by people, especially for those residing in rural areas, the poor, women and
children.

All work and no pay

JAYATI GHOSH (Frontline)
http://www.hinduonnet.com/fline/fl2515/stories/20080801251503700.htm

The National Rural Health Mission is designed around unpaid female social health activists, who are expected to mobilise health care for an entire village.

IN India, one of the more depressing features of government policy in the social sectors is the extent to which it relies on the unpaid or underpaid labour of women.

This was evident in the functioning of the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan in many States. This parallel system of “education centres” (rather than proper schools) was set up using local women with eight years of schooling to teach children for a paltry “remuneration” rather than employing trained teachers at regular wages. Similarly, the Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS) scheme operates on the basis of poorly paid Anganwadi workers and helpers.

While these women perform essential and demanding tasks that typically amount to full-time work, they are not given the status of regular government employees. And because their payment is so low that it would contravene minimum wage laws in many States, it is described as “honorarium”.

More recently, this tendency was taken to its logical conclusion. One of the flagship schemes of the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government – the National Rural Health Mission (NRHM) – relies almost entirely on unpaid female labour. Indeed, the lack of remuneration for the accredited social health activists (ASHAs), who form the backbone of the scheme, is part of its very design.

India is among the worst-performing countries when it comes to government expenditure on health. In 2004, such spending amounted to only 0.9 per cent of gross domestic product (GDP). Only four or five countries in the world had ratios lower than this. The UPA government had promised to increase this ratio to 3 per cent of GDP within five years, but four years on, it is still only around 1 per cent.

However, the government at least recognised the pressing need to improve health conditions when it launched the NRHM. Its stated goal is ambitious: to provide effective health care to the entire rural population, with special focus on the 18 States that have weak public health indicators. Commentators have pointed out that despite being presented as an entirely new flagship programme, the NRHM is essentially an amalgam of existing schemes and programmes. Most of its key components, including the reliance on ASHAs, have been tried before with varying degrees of success.

These elements include the provision of an ASHA in each village; a village health plan prepared by involving a local team headed by the panchayat representative; strengthening of the rural hospital for effective curative care and making it measurable through the Indian Public Health Standards (IPHS), and accountable to the community; and local integration of the programmes and funds of the Health and Family Welfare Department.

The most significant element of the NRHM is, therefore, an ASHA, who acts as the link between the community and the government health system and becomes the first port of call for any health-related matter, especially for less-privileged groups.

The mission statement makes that clear: “The ASHA will be a health activist in the community who will create awareness on health and its social determinants and mobilise the community towards local health planning and increased utilisation and accountability of the existing health services. She would be a promoter of good health practices. She will also provide a minimum package of curative care as appropriate and feasible for that level and make timely referrals.”

Does this already sound like a lot of work? But there is more, for the NRHM explicitly requires an ASHA to do many more things. Here is a brief list of the activities that she is required to undertake:

Create awareness and provide information to the community on determinants of health such as nutrition, basic sanitation and hygiene, healthy living and working conditions, information on existing health services and the need for timely utilisation of health and family welfare services;

Counsel women on birth preparedness, the importance of safe delivery, breastfeeding and complementary feeding, immunisation, contraception and prevention of common infections (including reproductive tract infections and sexually transmitted diseases) and on the care of young children;

Mobilise the community and facilitate access to the health and related services provided by the government at the local level, including immunisation, antenatal and post-natal check-ups, ICDS, sanitation, and so on;

Arrange to escort pregnant women and children requiring treatment and/or admission to the nearest pre-identified health facility, which could be the primary health centre or the first referral unit;

Provide primary medical care for minor ailments such as diarrhoea and fevers and first aid for minor injuries;

■ Be a provider of the Directly Observed Treatment Short-course (DOTS) under the Revised National Tuberculosis Control Programme;

■ Act as a depot holder for essential health provisions such as oral rehydration therapy fluids, folic acid tablets, chloroquine for treating malaria, disposable delivery kits, oral contraceptive pills and condoms;

Manage and allocate to members of the community the contents of the drug kit supposedly provided to each ASHA;

Inform the health authorities at the primary health centre or sub-centre about births and deaths in the village and any unusual health problems or outbreak of disease in the community;

Promote the construction of household toilets under the Total Sanitation Campaign; and

Work with the Village Health and Sanitation Committee of the gram panchayat to develop a comprehensive village health plan.

Just in case these tasks are not enough to keep the ASHA occupied, the NRHM website helpfully suggests that “States can explore the possibility of graded training to her for providing newborn care and management of a range of common ailments, particularly childhood illnesses”!

All these tasks are to be performed by a woman who is to serve one village or a population of 1,000. The minimum qualification of an ASHA has been set at eight years of completed schooling. This rigid requirement has been placed even though several parts of the country, especially the tribal and underdeveloped areas, which need such intervention the most, do not have literate women, much less those who have completed elementary school.

Once chosen, an ASHA receives a total of 23 days of training in separate modules before she returns to fulfil her responsibilities. It is hard to imagine how a few weeks of “training” in a typical government format can help create all these capacities, especially when an ASHA is also expected to diagnose and treat minor ailments and recognise serious illnesses. Once she has been chosen and trained and made to perform all these complex and demanding tasks, what is her remuneration? Amazingly, nothing! The NRHM envisages that an “ASHA would be an honorary volunteer and would not receive any salary or honorarium. Her work would be so tailored that it does not interfere with her normal livelihood.”

There is some grudging acceptance that ASHAs can be compensated for the period they spend in training but only at the training venue and by day of attendance. Any other remuneration can only come in the form of the monetary incentives that are given as part of specific programmes such as immunisation. Some State governments have instituted payments to ASHAs but in no case do they exceed Rs.1,000 a month. And, usually, ASHAs get much less, only around Rs.500 a month at the most. Yet, in most cases, fulfilling all their responsibilities would require ASHAs to work for more than eight hours a day as well as at odd times, given the unexpected nature of sickness, deliveries, and so on. All this is supposed to be done out of a sense of idealism and community feeling, trading on the time-worn stereotype of caring women who serve their families and communities selflessly.

It is appalling to think that such a major and massive programme could be designed and launched by explicitly relying on the unpaid labour of so many women – nearly 500,000 ASHAs have been recruited – and now there is talk of launching an Urban Health Mission with USHAs. The bureaucrats who administer this programme are only too happy to be the beneficiaries of periodic pay commission awards that allow their salaries to rise faster than the inflation rate.

But when it comes to ensuring essential health services for the people, the women who bear almost the entire responsibility for delivery are to be deprived of minimally adequate remuneration. This combination of cynicism and miserliness does not augur well for the success of the programme.



The Arogyada
www.arogyada.in

Treat villagers or pay fat med school fees :Dr Anbumani Ramadoss (Hindustan Times)

Soon, students studying medicine in government-run colleges will have to sign a bond promising to work in a government health centre for a year. And if they opt out, they will have to pay the bond money.

“They can pay the bond, which will be the amount private medical colleges charge as fees for an MBBS course,” Health minister Anbumani Ramadoss told Hindustan Times.

Tuition fees in private colleges range between Rs 20 lakh and Rs 25 lakh.

Those who work with health centres will be exempt from paying the annual MBBS tuition fees of Rs 250 a year charged by government colleges.

This proposal will replace the health ministry’s earlier hugely unpopular decision to introduce compulsory rural stint for all doctors before they could apply for a post-graduate course.

“I don’t know why people refer to it as rural posting; most centres are in small and medium-sized towns. They are compared to Delhi, Mumbai and Chennai, but people in big cities should get a taste of India’s social reality,” said Ramadoss. The proposal may be implemented for new entrants from next year.

There are 271 medical colleges in the country of which 138 are run by the government; the remaining 133 are private colleges. Together, these colleges offer 31,172 MBBS seats and 11,005 post-graduate courses.

“I don’t think the bond will deter students from taking up MBBS. The IITs charge students Rs 3.5 lakh a year, but the tuition fee in government medical colleges is just Rs 250 a year,” said Ramadoss.

The idea has been borrowed from the armed forces. Students applying for admission to MBBS at the Armed Forces Medical College have to sign a bond where they agree to serve as commissioned officers for seven years. Students opting out have to pay bond money of Rs 15 lakh.

The Arogyada
www.arogyada.in